Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Appeals Court Rules that HIV-Positive People’s Saliva Not a "Deadly Weapon"


A panel of judges on the New York Court of Appeals has unanimously overturned a lower court and ruled that if an HIV-positive person spits on or bites somebody, his/her saliva cannot be considered a "deadly weapon or dangerous instrument," as it had been deemed before. (See Sean Strub’s article “Prosecuting HIV” in the May+June issue of Positively Aware.)

David Plunkett was serving a 10-year sentence for punching and biting a police officer in 2006. Plunkett reportedly had a history of mental illness and assaulted one of the responding officers while causing a disturbance as a patient at an Ilion clinic.

In New York, in order for assault to become aggravated assault (which carries a greater penalty), the use of a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument is required. The original judge considered HIV-positive saliva a deadly weapon, making biting an aggravated assault and Plunkett pled guilty to both charges.

However, on June 7, the court dismissed the aggravated assault conviction, stating saliva should be treated the same as teeth, which in 1999 were deemed not to be dangerous instruments on the grounds that body parts come with the person and thus do not increase criminal liability.

The Friends of AIDS Foundation is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for HIV positive individuals and empowering people to make healthy choices to prevent the spread of the HIV virus. To learn more about The Friends of AIDS Foundation, please visit: http://www.friendsofaids.org.

TOGETHER WE REMAIN STRONG!