Search This Blog

Monday, July 8, 2013

HIV Treatment in Resource-limited Settings


Results of a large randomised trial support the use of treatment combinations consisting of a protease inhibitor plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) as second-line HIV therapy in resource-limited settings.

The combination achieved good outcomes for people who had experienced first-line treatment failure.

The roll-out of antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings often relies on standardised combinations of drugs. There is limited access to viral load monitoring and resistance testing. This means that it is not possible to individualise therapy as is the case in better-resourced countries.

Second-line therapy recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for resource-limited settings consists of a protease inhibitor plus two NRTIs. It is not certain if the benefits of continuing to use a ‘recycled’ NRTI backbone will outweigh the risk of serious side-effects or of virological failure. There is some evidence that an NRTI-free regimen is simpler, cheaper and equally effective.

The EARNEST study was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of three alternative second-line treatment strategies:

>The recommended WHO regimen, a protease inhibitor with an NRTI backbone.

>A protease inhibitor plus the integrase inhibitor raltegravir (Isentress).

>Protease inhibitor monotherapy after a twelve-week induction period phase with raltegravir.

Approximately 1300 people with first-line treatment failure, in five African countries, were recruited to the study. Routine viral load and resistance testing were unavailable. The study participants had severe immune suppression – average CD4 cell count at baseline was just 70 cells/mm3. Participants were followed for 144 weeks.

HIV disease was well controlled among people in the protease inhibitor/NRTI and protease inhibitor/raltegravir arms.

Approximately two thirds of participants taking these combinations also achieved a CD4 cell count above 250, high enough to be protective against most AIDS-defining illnesses. Drug resistance was rare among people taking these combinations.

Overall, outcomes were poorer for people taking protease inhibitor monotherapy.

All three combinations were safe and well tolerated.

The researchers therefore conclude their study findings strongly support WHO guidelines for second-line therapy, showing that prescribing previously used NRTIs doesn’t lead to adverse outcomes.

The Friends of AIDS Foundation is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for HIV positive individuals and empowering people to make healthy choices to prevent the spread of the HIV virus.

To learn more about The Friends of AIDS Foundation, please visit: http://www.friendsofaids.org.

TOGETHER WE REMAIN STRONG!